ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis in primary care using multi-agent systems.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting ADHD comorbidity in children with allergic rhinitis: a SHAP-based analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an inflammatory disease marked by chronic low back pain, with a global average diagnostic delay of 6.7 years. Early diagnosis is crucial for improving prognosis and reducing disability rates, yet primary care physicians (PCPs) may find it challenging to ensure timely recognition and referrals. This study developed and validated Spondyloarthritis Agents (SpAgents), an early diagnostic system based on a multi-agent framework integrating large language models (LLMs) and imaging models. The SpAgents framework includes PlannerAgent, DataAgent, ToolAgent, and DoctorAgent, supported by long-term memory for dynamic knowledge updates. We enrolled 596 patients, dividing 545 from one hospital into a training dataset (n = 359) and a validation dataset (n = 186), along with an independent cohort of 51 patients from five additional hospitals for testing. SpAgents demonstrated strong diagnostic performance, achieving sensitivity of 0.8615 and specificity of 0.8000 during validation, and 0.9375 and 0.7368 during testing. SpAgents exhibited significantly higher sensitivity (0.9400) and accuracy (0.8600) than both PCPs and junior rheumatologists, with overall performance equivalent to that of senior rheumatologists. Under SpAgents-assisted diagnosis, both PCPs and junior rheumatologists showed marked improvements in sensitivity and accuracy. SpAgents effectively enhance early axSpA identification among PCPs, offering an innovative solution to reduce diagnostic delays.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.