ArticleScientific reports2026
A causal discovery-based adaptive fusion algorithm for multi-source heterogeneous knowledge graphs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relation-aware context aggregation framework for sparse knowledge graph completion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-source heterogeneous knowledge graph fusion faces significant challenges due to schema heterogeneity, entity conflicts, and relationship inconsistencies across different knowledge sources. This paper proposes CausalFusion, a novel adaptive fusion algorithm that leverages causal discovery principles to guide the knowledge graph integration process. The algorithm incorporates a constraint-based causal discovery component specifically designed for relational data, an adaptive weight learning mechanism that dynamically adjusts source contributions based on causal strength, and a conflict resolution strategy that prioritizes causal consistency over statistical correlation. Experimental evaluation on benchmark datasets including DBpedia, Freebase, YAGO, and Wikidata demonstrates significant improvements in fusion quality, with the proposed method achieving 91.2% precision and 88.7% recall, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by 1.9% and 1.5% respectively. The results validate the effectiveness of incorporating causal inference into knowledge graph fusion, particularly for preserving meaningful causal relationships while resolving heterogeneity conflicts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.