ArticleScientific reports2026
Visual classification of allergenic pollen in iteratively reconstructed lens-less DIHM images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lens-less digital in-line holographic microscopy (DIHM) is a low-cost, wide-field imaging technique that relies on computational reconstruction to form focused images that should ideally be free of twin-image artifacts. While current DIHM-based pollen classification systems are typically automated and rely on large datasets and deep learning, our study explored whether iteratively reconstructed DIHM images using the Gerchberg–Saxton (GS) algorithm are suitable for visual classification by human experts. Two veterinary cytopathologists evaluated images of six clinically relevant pollen types, namely timothy grass, common ragweed, silver birch, common alder, olive tree, and hazel, using both lens-less DIHM and conventional optical microscopy. Classification accuracy was comparable across modalities, with DIHM achieving 95.8% and optical microscopy 96.9%. Inter-observer agreement was high (Cohen’s κ = 0.91), indicating near-perfect consistency between evaluators. Most misclassifications involved silver birch pollen, likely due to its morphological variability and overlap with common alder and hazel. These findings demonstrate that lens-less DIHM combined with iterative reconstruction enables accurate visual identification of allergenic pollen, offering a promising alternative to conventional microscopy in veterinary and other resource-limited settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.