ArticleScientific reports2026
Social context shapes facial dynamics: human and machine decoding of conversation topics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conversation is fundamental to the human species, with facial expressions playing a crucial role in establishing shared understanding within specific conversational contexts. We hypothesized that variations in conversation topics, differing in levels of tension and personal disclosure, would elicit distinct facial behavior dynamics. We assessed facial activity during two types of natural conversations with varying tension levels in triads of unacquainted individuals: "get-to-know-each-other" and “moral dilemma” discussions. Human observers classified the conversation type with 82.11% accuracy based on facial dynamics alone. Strikingly, a machine learning model using three facial action units (AUs 4, 6, and 12) during speech-free moments achieved comparable accuracy (82.14%). Further analyses revealed that the model relied on the temporal dynamics of these AUs to distinguish conversational contexts. These findings show that machine-based facial coding, coupled with deep learning, can infer conversational context from facial expressions, offering a scalable tool for analyzing natural social interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.