ArticleScientific reports2026
Lexical alignment persists across a 12 h interval but is unaffected by sleep versus wake.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep may play a key role in consolidating social interactions by transforming brief communicative experiences into stable social memories. In this paper, we used the lexical alignment task to investigate whether sleep enhances the consolidation of shared linguistic representations between partners. Lexical alignment, where participants converge their word choices with those produced by a partner, served as a marker of successful communication and shared understanding. Eighty-two participants completed a picture-matching and picture-naming task before and after 12 h of sleep or wake. Results showed the lexical alignment effect persisted 12 h after the initial picture-matching interaction. However, this effect was not influenced by whether participants slept or remained awake during the retention interval. These findings suggest that while participants encoded enduring representations of partner-specific lexical information during interaction, sleep-based consolidation did not confer an additional benefit. One possibility is that a higher level of social relevance is needed for these memories to be susceptible to sleep consolidation. Alternatively, limited hippocampal involvement during encoding may have reduced the extent to which information was reactivated during sleep. Future research should employ richer and more interactive tasks to clarify how sleep supports the consolidation of social experiences and relationship perceptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.