ArticleNature communications2026
Additive-specific modulation of non-classical nucleation pathways.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additives, comprising small quantities of organic and inorganic molecules, are crucial for controlling the crystallisation of various (bio)materials; however, their mechanisms remain poorly understood. By integrating in situ high-energy X-ray scattering with potentiometric titrations, we examine the impact of industrially relevant additives on the nucleation pathways of portlandite and gypsum. While both minerals undergo multistep nucleation, portlandite transitions gradually from a disordered to an ordered phase, whereas gypsum exhibits an abrupt transition. These distinct non-classical pathways and their pH conditions correlate with the mineral-specific effects of the additives. Additive effects extend beyond the classical models, such as cation-binding, exerting influence primarily during the prenucleation stage. Moreover, additives demonstrate a dual role by simultaneously delaying and accelerating different stages of nucleation, highlighting their multifaceted impact on the crystallisation process. These findings offer insights for designing tailored additives to optimise industrial crystallisation processes and advance the understanding of biomineralisation mechanisms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.