ArticleScientific data2026
Multimodal Phenotyping Dataset of Driving Fatigue.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Driving fatigue analysis using multimodal physiological signals has become a growing focus in human factor engineering research. We introduce the Multimodal Phenotyping Dataset of Driving Fatigue (MPD-DF), a public resource comprising data from 50 participants (35 females and 15 males) during a standardized 2-hour simulated driving task. The dataset includes multidimensional subjective and objective metrics for fatigue assessment, comprising multimodal physiological recordings (32-channel electroencephalogram, single-lead electrocardiogram, dual-channel electrooculogram, and thoracic respiratory effort signals), fatigue-associated questionnaire results, and expert physician annotations of fatigue levels. To the best of our knowledge, it contains the largest number of signal modalities and provides the first physician-annotated, EEG-based fatigue labels among existing public datasets. The dataset validity was evaluated across multiple dimensions, including fatigue induction efficacy, statistical analysis of questionnaire outcomes, physiological signal quality, and correlations between physiological signals and annotated fatigue levels. This extensively characterized and validated dataset provides a benchmark resource for developing fatigue detection algorithms, facilitating cross-dataset validation, and advancing mechanistic studies of driving fatigue to enhance transportation safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.