ArticleScientific reports2026
Genomic risk prediction of type 2 diabetes in people living with and without HIV.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of functional annotation-informed and ancestry-specific polygenic risk scores for ischemic stroke.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk prediction remains a challenge, particularly in underrepresented populations, including people living with HIV (PWH) and those of non-European ancestry. We evaluated the performance of two metaPRS (polygenic risk score) models, integrating genetic markers related to inflammation and lipid metabolism, in predicting T2D risk across ancestry groups (African and European), with and without HIV. The metaPRS were generated in a subset from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study (6,034 Black; 11,972 White) and validated in 7,580 (4,120 Black; 3,460 White) PWH from the Centers for AIDS Research of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS), as well as an additional 4,152 (2,586 Black; 1,566 White) seronegative participants from REGARDS. Incorporating the metaPRS into models provided non-significant improvements in T2D risk prediction compared to single-trait T2D PRS and clinical risk factors. Performance was similar in PWH and in people without HIV, suggesting that these general population-derived genetic scores are transferable to PWH. Future studies should focus on refining PRS models in diverse populations and exploring genetic factors specific to PWH regarding T2D risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.