Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571696›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Causal connectivity maps derived from single-pulse interleaved TMS/fMRI.

Lison Bossus, Jess Dickson, Camille Blaine, Hasti Khalilkhani, Ahsan Khan, Desmond J Oathes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04014959 (Mini Theta Burst TMS to Promote Brain Plasticity Indexed by fMRI in MDD Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04014959 nacompletednot on this map

Mini Theta Burst TMS to Promote Brain Plasticity Indexed by fMRI in MDD Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2017 to 2021Enrolled41ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Converging on control: Rethinking treatment-resistant depression through network neuroscience.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lison BossusCenter for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Jess DicksonCenter for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Camille BlaineCenter for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Hasti KhalilkhaniCenter for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Ahsan KhanCenter for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Desmond J OathesCenter for Brain Imaging and Stimulation, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. oathes@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Non-invasive neuromodulation mechanisms and dose/response metricsR01MH111886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI OATHES, DESMOND · 2016 to 2019
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding causal interactions between cortical and subcortical brain regions is critical for mapping human functional connectivity. While non-invasive methods such as fMRI and diffusion imaging have provided valuable insights into brain connectivity, these approaches remain correlational and cannot establish causal circuit mechanisms. Here, we aimed to generate reliable causal connectivity maps using interleaved single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation with functional MRI (spTMS/fMRI). In over 80 participants, personalized connectivity-guided targets in the left hemisphere were selected to engage either the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) or basolateral amygdala (BLA). Voxelwise event-related BOLD maps quantified TMS-evoked responses, and group-level analyses controlled for head motion, pain, and somatosensory effects to isolate stimulation-specific activation. Stimulation of frontal regions targeting the sgACC induced responses in the sgACC and modulated distributed cortical and subcortical areas. Ventrolateral targets elicited negative BOLD responses in the amygdala and engaged widespread downstream regions. ROI-based analyses revealed no significant differences in evoked responses between sgACC- and BLA-targeted stimulations across participants. These results validate that image-guided TMS can causally engage distributed brain circuits, providing a robust framework for functional connectivity mapping. The publicly available causal connectivity maps offer a resource for future studies linking cortical stimulation sites with subcortical network responses.Clinical Trial Registration This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04014959, and was open to enrollment from January 15, 2017 to October 1, 2020.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingGyrus CinguliMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAmygdalaFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41571696
PMCPMC12830895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.