Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571672›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The role of goal orientation, collaboration, and stress in shaping scientific creativity.

Le Chang, Chao Zhang, Huiying Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Le ChangSchool of Information Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chao ZhangSchool of Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Huiying ZhangCollege of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Weijin Road, Tianjin, 300072, China. zhanghytju@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study delves into the relationship between goal orientation and scientific creativity, crucial for driving innovation and solving complex challenges. Drawing on goal orientation theory and situated expectancy-value theory, we investigated how different goal orientations influence scientific creativity among 248 university researchers. The findings indicate that both learning and performance approach goals significantly enhance scientific creativity through knowledge collaboration. Additionally, the strength of perceived work-related stressors modulates this relationship; stronger perceptions of these stressors intensify the positive effects of learning and performance goals on creativity. The study contributes to theoretical understandings in several ways. First, it expands on how goal orientation influences creativity within scientific domains. Second, it sheds light on the role of stress as a catalyst in scientific creativity. Finally, it links stressor perspectives to organizational behaviour literature, providing valuable insights for organizational managers. These insights suggest that promoting learning and performance-oriented goals may be especially beneficial in environments where researchers encounter significant stressors, enhancing their creative outputs in public research institutions.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorCreativityGoalsResearch PersonnelStress, PsychologicalAcademiaHumansLearningUniversitiesKnowledge collaborationLearning goalPerformance approach goalScientific creativityWork stressful events

Identifiers

PMID41571672
PMCPMC12830752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.