Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571655›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Evaluating single-cell ATAC-seq atlasing technologies using sequence-to-function modeling.

Hannah Dickmänken, Marta Wojno, Lukas Mahieu, Koen Theunis, Eren Can Ekşi, Valerie Christiaens, Niklas Kempynck, Florian V De Rop, Natalie Roels, Katina I Spanier and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hannah DickmänkenLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9707-9293
Marta WojnoVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, CBD Technologies, Single Cell & Microfluidics Expertise Unit, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-1264
Lukas MahieuLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5085-6985
Koen TheunisLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0699-6676
Eren Can EkşiLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3122-9858
Valerie ChristiaensLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5024-8691
Niklas KempynckLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-4844
Florian V De RopLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-924X
Natalie RoelsLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8578-2622
Katina I SpanierLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1375-4157
Roel VandepoelLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-2179
Gert HulselmansLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
Suresh PoovathingalLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium. suresh.poovathingal@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3236-2255
Stein AertsLaboratory of Computational Biology, VIB Center for AI & Computational Biology, Leuven, Belgium. stein.aerts@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8006-0315

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101054387Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (Michael J. Fox Foundation) 1512 ASAP-025179Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (Michael J. Fox Foundation) ASAP-000430 733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciphering the cis-regulatory logic underlying cell type identity remains a key challenge in biology. Single-cell chromatin accessibility (scATAC-seq) atlases enable training of sequence-to-function (S2F) deep learning models to decode enhancer logic. Yet, optimal criteria for constructing training datasets, i.e., the number of cells and ATAC fragments, remain unclear. Moreover, the suitability of different scATAC-seq platforms for such models has not been systematically tested. We introduce HyDrop v2, an improved custom droplet scATAC-seq method, and perform the first benchmark of scATAC-seq platforms focusing on its capacity to train S2F models and its capacity to yield TF footprints in different species. We show that lower fragment counts can be compensated for by increased cell numbers. S2F models trained on custom or commercial data perform comparably in enhancer prediction, sequence explainability, and transcription factor footprinting. We demonstrate that integrating data from different scATAC-seq platforms enables large-scale, cost-efficient atlas construction for deep learning-based regulatory modeling.

Indexed as

ChromatinChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsDeep LearningEnhancer Elements, GeneticHumansTranscription FactorsChromatinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID41571655
PMCPMC12929571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.