Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571648›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Breaking the cell wall for efficient DNA delivery to diatoms.

E J L Walker, M Pampuch, L Deng, Y Li, G Tran, T Mock, B J Karas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E J L WalkerDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Dentistry and Medicine, London, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1353-3899
M PampuchDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Dentistry and Medicine, London, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4912-1439
L DengSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Y LiSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
G TranDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Dentistry and Medicine, London, ON, Canada.
T MockSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9604-0362
B J KarasDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Dentistry and Medicine, London, ON, Canada. bkaras@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1199-4245

Funding

RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/Z504130/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diatoms produce 20% of the world's fixed organic carbon yet remain underutilized as cell factories due to limited genetic engineering tools. Here, we present optimized electroporation and polyethylene glycol (PEG) transformation methods for the model diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum, enabling delivery of DNA and Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes with high efficiency. Transformants are recovered with as little as 1 ng of DNA, and linear or circular episomes as large as 55.6 kb are successfully introduced. The optimized electroporation protocol also reveals an unexpected capability: episomes can be assembled directly in the algal cell through non-homologous or homology-driven repair mechanisms, a process we term diatom in vivo assembly (DIVA). In addition, the PEG approach is adapted to successfully transform Thalassiosira pseudonana, demonstrating the applicability of our methods for engineering other diatom species. These tools could be used to accelerate diatom synthetic biology projects and, therefore, the development of sustainable technologies.

Indexed as

Cell WallDiatomsDNAGene Transfer TechniquesElectroporationGenetic EngineeringPlasmidsPolyethylene GlycolsTransformation, GeneticDNAPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID41571648
PMCPMC12921017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.