Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571453›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

Bidirectional Cerebellar Control of Suprasecond Timing in Rats.

Ellen Boven, Jasmine Pickford, Richard Apps, Nadia L Cerminara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellen BovenDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam 3015 AA, The Netherlands e.boven@erasmusmc.nl n.cerminara@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6919-7612
Jasmine PickfordSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3806-3018
Richard AppsSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-3359
Nadia L CerminaraSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, United Kingdom e.boven@erasmusmc.nl n.cerminara@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8207-5871

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cerebellum is well established in subsecond motor timing, but its role in suprasecond interval timing remains unclear. Here, we investigated how cerebellar output influences time estimation over longer timescales. Male rats performed a nose-poke interval timing task in which reward availability could be predicted either from a fixed 2.5 s auditory cue (cued trials) or had to be estimated internally during uncued 3.5 s trials that demanded self-timing. Chemogenetic inhibition of the lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN) produced bidirectional effects: delayed action initiation in predictable trials and premature (∼100-160 ms) responses when self-timing was required. Despite a slowing of movement, overall task success rates remained unchanged. Because motor slowing is likely to lead to later, not earlier, action initiation, these results implicate the LCN in computing internal time estimates. These findings demonstrate that the cerebellum integrates motor and cognitive processes for suprasecond timing, with differential effects on externally guided and self-generated timing.

Indexed as

Cerebellar NucleiCerebellumTime PerceptionAnimalsCuesMaleMotor ActivityRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction TimeRewardTime Factorscerebellumpredictionsubsecondsuprasecondtiming

Identifiers

PMID41571453
PMCPMC12872300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.