Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571414›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Trajectories of cigarette smoking and exposure to welding fumes and their impact on lung cancer risks: a latent class modelling approach.

Benjamin Kendzia, Dirk Taeger, Hermann Pohlabeln, Wolfgang Ahrens, Heinz-Erich Wichmann, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Thomas Brüning, Thomas Behrens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin KendziaInstitute of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Bochum, Germany benjamin.kendzia@dguv.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8662-795X
Dirk TaegerInstitute of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5340-5584
Hermann PohlabelnEpidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS GmbH and Institute for Statistics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Wolfgang AhrensEpidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS GmbH and Institute for Statistics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Heinz-Erich WichmannInstitute of Epidemiology I, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Neuherberg, Germany.
Karl-Heinz JöckelInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas BrüningInstitute of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Bochum, Germany.
Thomas BehrensInstitute of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-5234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTraditional epidemiological approaches usually assume a constant relationship between cumulative exposure and disease, which implies that exposure duration and intensity contribute equally to the studied outcome. But individuals with the same cumulative exposure but different temporal exposure patterns may show different risks. Trajectory classification is a good way to assess exposure-risk associations and leads to a better understanding of lifetime variability in exposure levels. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate lung cancer risk according to the exposure trajectory classes on welding fumes and cigarette smoking.

designTwo population-based German case-control studies.

participants3498 male lung cancer cases and 3539 male control subjects.

methodsSeparate latent class mixed models (LCMM) were determined to identify profiles of exposure trajectories of cigarette smoking and occupational exposure to welding fumes. To investigate the risk of lung cancer by class membership, ORs with 95% CI were estimated via multiple logistic regression analyses.

resultsLCMM each identified four latent classes of smoking and welding-fume exposure. Classes of smokers showed much higher risk of lung cancer compared with never smokers or subjects exposed to welding fumes. Smokers in one class characterised with the highest exposure over the past 10 years had the highest adjusted lung cancer risk (OR=39; 95% CI 29 to 53). For welding, the highest lung cancer risks were found for the class in which exposure to welding fumes in the past 10 years prior to the diagnosis of lung cancer was highest and the duration of welding was also quite high (OR=1.71; 95% CI 0.92 to 3.15).

conclusionsIn summary, LCMM opens a new perspective on dose-effect relationships and could be employed to complement established epidemiological methods.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingLung NeoplasmsOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureWeldingAdultAgedAir Pollutants, OccupationalCase-Control StudiesGermanyHumansLatent Class AnalysisLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAir Pollutants, OccupationalEPIDEMIOLOGYLung DiseasesOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINESTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID41571414
PMCPMC12829345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.