Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571054›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Deep learning motion correction of quantitative stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Noortje I P Schueler, Nathan C K Wong, Richard J Crawley, Josien P W Pluim, Amedeo Chiribiri, Cian M Scannell

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Noortje I P SchuelerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Nathan C K WongSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard J CrawleySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Josien P W PluimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Amedeo ChiribiriSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Cian M ScannellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.m.scannell@tue.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantitative stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a valuable tool for assessing myocardial ischemia. Motion correction is a crucial step in automated quantification pipelines, especially for high-resolution pixel-wise mapping. Established methods for motion correction, based on image registration, are computationally intensive and sensitive to changes in image acquisitions, necessitating more efficient and robust solutions.

methodsThis study developed and evaluated an unsupervised deep learning-based motion correction pipeline. Based on a previously described approach, it corrects motion in three steps while using (robust) principal component analysis to mitigate the effects of the dynamic contrast. The time-consuming iterative registration optimizations are replaced with an efficient one-shot estimation by trained deep learning models. The pipeline aligns the perfusion series and includes auxiliary images series as follows: the low-resolution, short-saturation preparation time arterial input function series and the proton density-weighted images. The deep learning models were trained and validated on multi-vendor data from 201 patients, with 38 held out for independent testing. The performance was evaluated in terms of the temporal alignment of the image series and the derived quantitative perfusion values in comparison to a previously established optimization-based registration approach.

resultsThe deep learning approach significantly improved temporal smoothness of time-intensity curves compared to the previously published baseline (p<0.001). Temporal alignment of the myocardium (based on automated segmentations) was similar between methods and significantly improved for both as compared to before registration (mean (standard deviation) Dice = 0.92 (0.04) and Dice = 0.91 (0.05) (respectively) vs Dice = 0.80 (0.09), both p<0.001). Quantitative perfusion maps were also smoother, indicating a reduction of motion artifacts, with a median (interquartile range) standard deviation of 0.52 (0.39) ml/min/g in myocardial segments, than before motion correction and improved compared to the baseline method (0.55 [0.44] mL/min/g). Processing time was reduced by a factor of 15 for a representative image series using the deep learning approach in comparison to the iterative method.

conclusionThe deep learning approach offers faster and more robust motion correction for stress perfusion CMR, improving accuracy for the dynamic contrast-enhanced data and the auxiliary images. It was trained with multi-vendor data and different acquisition sequence implementations, so, as well as enhancing efficiency and performance, it could facilitate broader clinical use of quantitative perfusion CMR.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingArtifactsContrast MediaDobutamineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotionPerfusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsContrast MediaDobutamineVasodilator AgentsDeep learningImage registrationMotion correctionQuantitative stress perfusion CMR

Identifiers

PMID41571054
PMCPMC13246310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.