Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571012›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2026

NICU Virtual Family-Centered Rounds: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jennifer L Rosenthal, Kristin R Hoffman, Daniel J Tancredi, James P Marcin, Audriana Ketchersid, Elva T Horath, Erika N Zerda, Trevor R Bushong, Daniel S Merriott, Heather M Young and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer L RosenthalDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Kristin R HoffmanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Daniel J TancrediDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
James P MarcinDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Audriana KetchersidDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Elva T HorathDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Erika N ZerdaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Trevor R BushongDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Daniel S MerriottDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Heather M YoungBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.
Patrick S RomanoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.

Funding

Telemedicine Consultations to Improve Care Quality of Pediatric Hospital-to-Hospital TransfersK23HD101550 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ROSENTHAL, JENNIFER · 2020 to 2023
$803k
Virtual Family-Centered Rounds to Improve Health and Quality of Life Outcomes for Neonates and their CaregiversR21NR020330 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ROSENTHAL, JENNIFER · 2022 to 2023
$400k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD101550NINR NIH HHS R21 NR020330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe use of telehealth to bring a family member virtually to the bedside for family-centered rounds (FCR) is a promising strategy to increase family members' access. We aimed to evaluate the impact of offering families the option to use virtual FCR in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) on parental and neonatal outcomes.

methodsThis 2-arm cluster randomized controlled trial assigned families of hospitalized infants to the option of using virtual FCR (intervention) or to usual care (control). Intervention families could also attend FCR in person (usual care). All eligible families of infants who were admitted to this single-site neonatal intensive care unit during the study period were included. Outcomes included FCR attendance, parent experience, family-centered care, parent activation, parent health-related quality of life, length of stay, breastmilk feeding, and neonatal growth.

resultsFrom March 2023 to 2024, 486 families were randomized (325 intervention, 161 control). Infants in the intervention arm were estimated to have 4.81 (95% CI 3.65-6.32) times the parent attendance rate of infants in the control arm (unadjusted incidence rate ratio: 4.62 [95% CI 3.40-6.28]). The intervention arm had 0.37 (95% CI 0.18-0.75) times the adjusted odds of a 30-day emergency department revisit compared with the control arm (unadjusted odds ratio: 0.48 [95% CI 0.25-0.91]). No statistically significant positive intervention effects were observed for other secondary outcomes.

conclusionsOffering virtual FCR increased parent attendance and reduced 30-day emergency department revisits among NICU infants.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalTeaching RoundsTelemedicineBreast FeedingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLength of StayMaleParentsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41571012
PMCPMC12884875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.