ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Effects of Image Degradation on Deep Neural Network Classification of Scaphoid Fracture Radiographs: Comparison Study of Different Noise Types.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Deep learning models have shown strong potential for automated fracture detection in medical images. However, their robustness under varying image quality remains uncertain, particularly for small and subtle fractures, such as scaphoid fractures. Understanding how different types of image perturbations affect model performance is crucial for ensuring reliable deployment in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the robustness of a deep learning model trained to detect scaphoid fractures in radiographs when exposed to various image perturbations. We sought to identify which perturbations most strongly impact performance and to explore strategies to mitigate performance degradation. Methods: Radiographic datasets were systematically modified by applying Gaussian noise, blurring, JPEG compression, contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization, resizing, and geometric offsets. Model accuracy was evaluated across different perturbation types and levels. Image quality was quantified using peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index measure to assess correlations between degradation and model performance. Results: Model accuracy declined with increasing perturbation severity, but the extent varied across perturbation types. Gaussian blur caused the most substantial performance drop, whereas contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization increased the false-negative rate. The model demonstrated higher resilience to color perturbations than to grayscale degradations. A strong linear correlation was found between peak signal-to-noise ratio-structural similarity index measure and accuracy, suggesting that better image quality led to improved detection. Geometric offsets and pixel value rescaling had minimal influence, whereas resolution was the dominant factor affecting performance. Conclusions: The findings indicate that image quality, especially resolution and blurring, substantially influences the robustness of deep learning-based fracture detection models. Ensuring adequate image resolution and quality control can enhance diagnostic reliability. These results provide valuable insights for designing more accurate and resilient medical imaging models under real-world variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.