ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Application of qualifying variants for genomic analysis.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationQualifying variants (QVs) are genomic alterations selected by defined criteria within analysis pipelines. Although crucial for both research and clinical diagnostics, QVs are often seen as simple filters rather than dynamic elements that influence the entire workflow. In practice these rules are embedded within pipelines, which hinders transparency, audit, and reuse across tools. A unified, portable specification for QV criteria is needed.
resultsOur aim is to embed the concept of a "QV" into the genomic analysis vernacular, moving beyond its treatment as a single filtering step. By decoupling QV criteria from pipeline variables and code, the framework enables clearer discussion, application, and reuse. It provides a flexible reference model for integrating QVs into analysis pipelines, improving reproducibility, interpretability, and interdisciplinary communication. Validation across diverse applications confirmed that QV based workflows match conventional methods while offering greater clarity and scalability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and data are accessible at the Zenodo repository https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17414191. Manuscript files are available at https://github.com/DylanLawless/qvApp2025lawless. The QV framework is available under the MIT licence, and the dataset will be maintained for at least two years following publication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.