Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41570036›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

A predicted structural interactome reveals binding interference from intrinsically disordered regions.

Junhui Peng, Li Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junhui PengLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2855-2299
Li ZhaoLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6776-1996

Funding

The genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of phenotypic innovationhttps://apps.era.nih.gov/gm/reportCheckList.do?applicationID=9798249R35GM133780 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI Li Zhao · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins function through dynamic interactions with other proteins in cells, forming complex networks fundamental to cellular processes. While high-resolution and high-throughput methods have significantly advanced our understanding of how proteins interact with each other, the molecular details of many important protein-protein interactions are still poorly characterized, especially in non-mammalian species, including Drosophila. Recent advancements in deep learning techniques have enabled the prediction of molecular details in various cellular pathways at the network level. In this study, we used AlphaFold2 Multimer to examine and predict protein-protein interactions from both physical and functional datasets in Drosophila. We found that functional associations contribute significantly to high-confidence predictions. Through detailed structural analysis, we also found the importance of intrinsically disordered regions in the predicted high-confidence interactions. Our study highlights the importance of disordered regions in protein-protein interactions and demonstrates the importance of incorporating functional interactions in predicting physical interactions between proteins. We further compiled an interactive web interface to present these predictions, facilitating functional exploration, comparative analysis, and the generation of mechanistic hypotheses for future studies.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProtein Interaction MappingAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinDrosophilaModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MapsDrosophila ProteinsIntrinsically Disordered Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41570036
PMCPMC12854418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.