ArticlePloS one2026
A screening strategy based on machine learning for diagnostic biomarkers in small cell lung cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive subtype with high mortality rates due to the lack of specific diagnostic biomarkers to delay the optimal opportunity for treatment. Traditional biomarkers, such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE) or pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), have insufficient specificity and sensitivity to meet the demands of clinical diagnosis. Exosome and its contents have become burgeoning cancer biomarkers due to their diverse molecular cargo to achieve intercellular communication. Herein, a novel machine learning strategy was reported for rapid, efficient screening of biomarkers and identified an optimal exosome RNA combination as diagnostic biomarker of SCLC. Firstly, RNA sequencing data from 111 SCLC patients and 362 healthy controls were obtained from the exoRBase 2.0 and 3.0 databases. The machine learning methods were employed to select specific RNA by using 20 iterations with 10-fold nested cross-validation for SCLC diagnosis. Then, an optimal combination of three exosome RNAs (LINC00989, CXCL5, and MAP3K7CL) was confirmed and achieved excellent diagnostic performance (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.950, sensitivity of 0.936, and specificity of 0.892). Finally, an independent validation cohort containing tissue-based RNA expression data for two biomarkers (CXCL5 and MAP3K7CL) from 79 SCLC patients and 7 standard controls was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the selected RNAs. The results demonstrated modest diagnostic performance in tissue samples (AUC = 0.718) with two biomarkers, indicating potential cross-tissue applicability despite the limitations of incomplete biomarker coverage. In addition, a specificity analysis of exosome RNA data, including gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer, demonstrated significant specificity for SCLC. Therefore, the novel biomarker screening strategy integrating nested cross-validation with multiple machine learning algorithms successfully established to offer a potentially valuable protocol for early SCLC diagnosis and other cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.