ArticleNeuroRehabilitation2026
Mirror Neuron System and Upper-Limb EMG Activity During Reaching Imitation in Stroke Survivors: Comparing Outcomes After Observing Normal vs. Aberrant Movements.
Article in NeuroRehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeTo assess how brain cortical activity and upper limb (UL) muscle activity associated with the imitation of a UL reaching task differ following action observation of normal and aberrant movement conditions.Materials and MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 17 individuals who had unilateral stroke were asked to watch a UL reaching task performed with normal and aberrant movement patterns shown with prerecorded videos and then imitate normal movement patterns. Electroencephalographic mu-rhythm activity, a measure of the mirror neuron system (MNS), and the electromyographic amplitudes of four paretic UL muscles (percentage maximum voluntary contraction) were measured during action observation and imitation (AOI) of normal and aberrant conditions. Freidman's ANOVA was used to compare the outcomes across the conditions.ResultsEEG analysis revealed statistically significant suppression of mu-rhythm (demonstrating better MNS activity) during the AOI of normal movement than during aberrant movement conditions at the C3 (p = 0.001) and C4 (p = 0.003) electrodes. Furthermore, the amplitude of percentage maximum voluntary contraction for the supraspinatus muscle significantly increased (p = 0.027) during imitation of the task following observation of the normal movement condition.ConclusionAOI of normal movements resulted in better MNS activity and increased supraspinatus muscle activity than did the observation of aberrant movements. These findings support the incorporation of therapist-guided AOI training focused on normal movement patterns and the avoidance of exposure to aberrant models as a low-cost, neurophysiology-driven adjunct in stroke rehabilitation protocols.Trial RegistrationClinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI) identifier: CTRI/2018/04/013466.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.