Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569978›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Experimental evidence that penis size, height, and body shape influence assessment of male sexual attractiveness and fighting ability in humans.

Upama Aich, Chloe Tan, Rebecca Bathgate, Khandis R Blake, Robert C S Capp, Jacob C Kuek, Bob B M Wong, Brian S Mautz, Michael D Jennions

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Upama AichCentre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences (M092), University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2576-0922
Chloe TanDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Rebecca BathgateDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Khandis R BlakeMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert C S CappMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jacob C KuekMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bob B M WongSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Brian S MautzDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Michael D JennionsDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why the human penis is unusually large compared to that of other primates is a long-standing evolutionary question. Sexual selection, through female mate choice and male-male competition, is a likely driver, but confirming this is difficult due to natural covariation among traits. The solution is to experimentally manipulate focal traits to identify targets of selection. Using 343 computer-generated male figures that varied in penis size, height and body shape, we experimentally tested how these traits influence perceived attractiveness and fighting ability. Over 800 participants-both male and female-viewed either life-sized (in-person) or scaled (online) animations and rated the figures. Across both settings, selection analyses revealed consistent directional selection favoring taller men with a more V-shaped body and a larger penis. In both surveys, male participants rated rivals with a larger penis as more sexually competitive and physically threatening. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental evidence that males assess rivals' fighting ability and attractiveness to females based partly on a rival's penis size. Our findings suggest that female choice and male-male competition have jointly favored larger penis size, greater height, and more V-shaped bodies in men.

Indexed as

AggressionBeautyPenisSexual BehaviorSexual SelectionAdultBody HeightBody SizeFemaleHumansMaleOrgan SizeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41569978
PMCPMC12826512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.