ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Radiation exposure to deep brain stimulation leads during multiple cranial radiation courses: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Concurrently, brain tumors are increasing in incidence, creating complex clinical scenarios when both conditions coexist. The safety of delivering radiation therapy to patients with active DBS devices remains poorly documented, with limited guidelines available. OBSERVATIONS: This case report describes a 69-year-old male PD patient with bilateral DBS leads who developed metastatic melanoma with brain metastases. He underwent multiple radiation treatments, including stereotactic radiosurgery and hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy, receiving a cumulative dose exceeding 47 Gy to the DBS device. Throughout treatment, the DBS device remained fully functional with no impedance changes or symptom deterioration. A review of similar cases indicates that radiation doses to DBS components, including leads and implantable pulse generators, are generally well tolerated, although no standardized safety protocols currently exist. LESSONS: This case reinforces the feasibility and safety of multiple radiation treatments in patients with implanted DBS devices when carefully planned and monitored. Cumulative high radiation doses may not impair DBS functionality, but attention to neutron contamination and dose distribution remains essential. Multidisciplinary collaboration and individualized planning are crucial to optimize tumor control while preserving device integrity in this emerging patient population. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25600.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.