ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Differential diagnosis and management of subaxial cervical chondroma: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeriosteal chondromas are rare benign cartilaginous tumors that rarely arise in the spine, with cervical localization being exceptionally uncommon. Most of reported cases of cervical chondroma involve younger patients and are often diagnosed in the upper cervical region (C1-2). The authors present the case of a 65-year-old woman with a history of metastatic breast cancer undergoing routine PET-CT, which revealed a hypermetabolic osteodestructive lesion at C6. MRI findings suggested spinal metastasis with myeloradicular compression. OBSERVATIONS: Surgery was performed via anterior cervical corpectomy and arthrodesis using a carbon fiber cage to minimize postoperative MRI artifacts and optimize radiotherapy. Gross-total resection was achieved with no neurological complications. Follow-up imaging confirmed adequate decompression and cervical spine stability. Histopathological examination surprisingly showed a periosteal chondroma. LESSONS: Cervical chondromas are rare and can be misdiagnosed as metastatic lesions especially in older patients with previous history of cancer, emphasizing the need for histopathological diagnosis. Carbon fiber implants offer advantages for postoperative imaging and radiotherapy planning, if needed. Further research is warranted to explore potential genetic or syndromic links in oncological patients with atypical spinal chondromas. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25303.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.