ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Shunt-related internal carotid artery dissection during carotid endarterectomy: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative shunt use during carotid endarterectomy (CEA), although critical for cerebral protection, may cause internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection in approximately 0.5% of cases. Shunt-induced dissections represent a distinct pathophysiological mechanism, differing from surgical technique-related dissection, and typically occur distal to the arteriotomy site due to trauma from shunt tips or balloon inflation. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present 2 cases of ICA dissection occurring during CEA with shunt use, both successfully managed with emergency endovascular stent insertion. In both case, complete resolution was achieved, with modified Rankin Scale scores of 0. Case 1 involved a 70-year-old male with 95% right carotid stenosis who developed dissection extending 6 cm distal to the arteriotomy. Dual-stent carotid artery stent placement resulted in complete resolution. Case 2 involved an 80-year-old female who developed extensive 55-mm left internal carotid dissection, immediately treated with overlapping dual-stent placement. A literature review of 13 cases demonstrated favorable outcomes with recent endovascular management approaches. LESSONS: Shunt-related dissection is a preventable complication requiring specific technical precautions, including ensuring symmetric balloon expansion, using a gentle insertion technique, and minimizing longitudinal movement. When dissection occurs, immediate endovascular stent placement may provide superior outcomes compared with conservative management, effectively preventing thromboembolic complications while achieving excellent functional recovery. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25697.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.