Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569757›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025

Radiological analysis correlated with neurological outcomes following resection of myxopapillary ependymoma: patient series.

Nitish Seenarine, Noah M Nichols, John K Houten, Konstantinos Margetis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nitish SeenarineCollege of Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-675X
Noah M NicholsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
John K HoutenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Konstantinos MargetisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3715-8093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyxopapillary ependymomas (MPEs) are rare intradural extramedullary tumors that often involve the conus and cauda equina. Current guidelines recommend resection as first-line management, but, despite a 92.4% overall 10-year survival rate, MPEs often have a high potential for postoperative morbidity with persisting or worsened neurological function. While several studies have identified potential radiological prognostic factors, none have specifically explored their relation to neurological outcomes. OBSERVATIONS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 16 MPE cases surgically treated within their institution between 2010 and 2021, evaluating preoperative/postoperative clinical data, surgical variables, and preoperative radiological features. Univariable analysis was performed using ANOVA for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables across neurological outcome groups. Multivariable modeling of neurological outcomes was done using logistic regression utilizing only radiological variables with a p value < 0.2. None of the radiological predictors reached statistical significance. The presence of preoperative weakness was the only significant predictor of a good neurological outcome within this model, while conus involvement was a significant predictor of urinary dysfunction at the final follow-up. LESSONS: Tumor size, conus involvement, and preoperative weakness are prognostic factors that may affect the morbidity profile of patients following resection. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25392.

Indexed as

myxopapillary ependymomaneurological outcomeradiological features

Identifiers

PMID41569757
PMCPMC12721111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.