ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Radiological analysis correlated with neurological outcomes following resection of myxopapillary ependymoma: patient series.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyxopapillary ependymomas (MPEs) are rare intradural extramedullary tumors that often involve the conus and cauda equina. Current guidelines recommend resection as first-line management, but, despite a 92.4% overall 10-year survival rate, MPEs often have a high potential for postoperative morbidity with persisting or worsened neurological function. While several studies have identified potential radiological prognostic factors, none have specifically explored their relation to neurological outcomes. OBSERVATIONS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 16 MPE cases surgically treated within their institution between 2010 and 2021, evaluating preoperative/postoperative clinical data, surgical variables, and preoperative radiological features. Univariable analysis was performed using ANOVA for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables across neurological outcome groups. Multivariable modeling of neurological outcomes was done using logistic regression utilizing only radiological variables with a p value < 0.2. None of the radiological predictors reached statistical significance. The presence of preoperative weakness was the only significant predictor of a good neurological outcome within this model, while conus involvement was a significant predictor of urinary dysfunction at the final follow-up. LESSONS: Tumor size, conus involvement, and preoperative weakness are prognostic factors that may affect the morbidity profile of patients following resection. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25392.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.