Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569709›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2026

Widespread invasion of a giant prolactinoma via valveless venous channels: illustrative case.

Allison S Liang, Jeffrey L Nadel, Madeleine de Lotbiniere-Bassett, Karen L Salzman, William T Couldwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison S LiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center.
Jeffrey L NadelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center.ORCID 0009-0004-5464-2508
Madeleine de Lotbiniere-BassettDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center.ORCID 0000-0002-6234-7080
Karen L SalzmanDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
William T CouldwellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center.ORCID 0000-0002-0070-0053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 35% of pituitary adenomas that require surgical intervention are invasive, often extending into the cavernous sinus (CS) via dural wall defects. Given the connections between the CS and multiple valveless venous plexuses in the orbit, face, and clivus, hematological venous spread is plausible, but the pathway by which these tumors locally invade remains uncertain. OBSERVATIONS: A 26-year-old man with right eye proptosis who presented for trauma was incidentally found to have an extensive pituitary mass. The lesion demonstrated invasion into both CSs, the right orbit, the bilateral retroclival space, and the right jugular foramen, with radiographic extension into a dilated right superior ophthalmic vein. Laboratory workup revealed a markedly elevated prolactin level of 18,178 ng/mL (normal: 2.10-17.70 ng/mL), consistent with a giant prolactinoma. He was treated effectively with cabergoline and without surgery. LESSONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first documented case illustrating extensive venous-mediated spread of a pituitary adenoma through valveless venous networks involving the CS, orbital, and clival regions, and it provides a plausible mechanism for the enhanced invasive nature of prolactin-secreting tumors. This case underscores the need for thorough imaging and endocrine evaluation before considering the surgical management of suspected invasive pituitary lesions. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25891.

Indexed as

case reportcavernous sinuspituitary tumorprolactinomasuperior ophthalmic vein

Identifiers

PMID41569709
PMCPMC12770988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.