ArticleBlood advances2026
Molecular features of response and resistance to glofitamab, a T-cell engager for treatment of large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [The efficacy and safety of glofitamab combined with polatuzumab vedotin in the treatment of 9 cases of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after failing CAR-T cell therapy].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Bispecific Antibodies in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Cells · 2026Review
- Clinical Impact of a LAG3 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism in Relapsed, Refractory DLBCL Patients Treated with Glofitamab.Cancers · 2026Article
- Glofitamab in the sequential treatment of relapsed/refractory B-Cell lymphoma: a single-center real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractT-cell engagers (TCEs) have recently transformed the therapeutic landscape of hematological malignancies, including relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). However, the variability in patient responses underscores the need for a deeper mechanistic understanding of the factors driving efficacy. Immune cell composition and T-cell functional states are emerging as critical determinants of immunotherapy outcomes. Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies have enabled high-resolution characterization of T-cell states, revealing a spectrum from highly activated effectors to exhausted or dysfunctional subsets within the tumor microenvironment. In this study, we conducted longitudinal scRNA-seq analyses and functional assessments of peripheral blood immune cells (peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs]) from patients with glofitamab-treated R/R B-NHL, achieving complete metabolic response, or with progressive metabolic disease. Our findings reveal that the maintenance of naïve-like ("fresher") T-cell states (particularly the fresher cytotoxic T cells) at early time points is associated with clinical efficacy. In line with molecular data, T cells from responders exhibited enhanced functional activity compared with nonresponders. Furthermore, the analysis of patient PBMCs and intratumor T cells from preclinical tumor models after consecutive glofitamab treatments revealed sustained functional activity, underscoring the long-term durability of T-cell responses. Combination of glofitamab with 4-1BB costimulation translated into increased proportions of intratumor T cells having a fresher, naïve-like phenotype, ultimately leading to stronger antitumor efficacy. Taken together, our findings underscore the therapeutic relevance of fresher, naïve-like T-cell states and the potential of leveraging 4-1BB costimulation to overcome TCE resistance and improve clinical responses in aggressive lymphomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.