Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569616›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Nonparametric Bayesian Adjustment of Unmeasured Confounders in Cox Proportional Hazards Models.

Shunichiro Orihara, Shonosuke Sugasawa, Tomohiro Ohigashi, Keita Hirano, Tomoyuki Nakagawa, Masataka Taguri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shunichiro OriharaDepartment of Health Data Science, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-1250
Shonosuke SugasawaGraduate School of Economics, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-4280
Tomohiro OhigashiDepartment of Information and Computer Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Keita HiranoDepartment of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomoyuki NakagawaSchool of Data Science, Meisei University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masataka TaguriDepartment of Health Data Science, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8902-0056

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K13019Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K20592Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K14862Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K20739Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K21166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmeasured confounders pose a major challenge in accurately estimating causal effects in observational studies. To address this issue when estimating hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards models, several methods, including instrumental variables (IVs) approaches, have been proposed. However, these methods often face limitations, such as weak IV problems and restrictive assumptions regarding unmeasured confounder distributions. In this study, we introduce a novel nonparametric Bayesian procedure that provides accurate HR estimates while addressing these limitations. A key assumption of our approach is that unmeasured confounders exhibit a cluster structure. Under this assumption, we integrate two remarkable Bayesian techniques, the Dirichlet process mixture (DPM) and general Bayes (GB), to simultaneously (1) detect latent clusters based on the likelihood of exposure and outcome variables and (2) estimate HRs using the likelihood constructed within each cluster. Notably, leveraging DPM, our procedure eliminates the need for IVs by identifying unmeasured confounders under an alternative condition. Additionally, GB techniques remove the need for explicit modeling of the baseline hazard function, distinguishing our procedure from traditional Bayesian approaches. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the proposed Bayesian procedure outperforms existing methods in some performance metrics. Moreover, it achieves statistical efficiency comparable to the efficient estimator while accurately identifying cluster structures. These features highlight its ability to overcome challenges associated with traditional IV approaches for time-to-event data.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremProportional Hazards ModelsStatistics, NonparametricComputer SimulationConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicHumansLikelihood FunctionsObservational Studies as TopicclusteringDirichlet process mixturegeneral Bayestime‐to‐eventUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID41569616
PMCPMC12826352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.