ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Nonparametric Bayesian Adjustment of Unmeasured Confounders in Cox Proportional Hazards Models.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nonparametric Bayesian Adjustment of Unmeasured Confounders in Cox Proportional Hazards Models.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unmeasured confounders pose a major challenge in accurately estimating causal effects in observational studies. To address this issue when estimating hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards models, several methods, including instrumental variables (IVs) approaches, have been proposed. However, these methods often face limitations, such as weak IV problems and restrictive assumptions regarding unmeasured confounder distributions. In this study, we introduce a novel nonparametric Bayesian procedure that provides accurate HR estimates while addressing these limitations. A key assumption of our approach is that unmeasured confounders exhibit a cluster structure. Under this assumption, we integrate two remarkable Bayesian techniques, the Dirichlet process mixture (DPM) and general Bayes (GB), to simultaneously (1) detect latent clusters based on the likelihood of exposure and outcome variables and (2) estimate HRs using the likelihood constructed within each cluster. Notably, leveraging DPM, our procedure eliminates the need for IVs by identifying unmeasured confounders under an alternative condition. Additionally, GB techniques remove the need for explicit modeling of the baseline hazard function, distinguishing our procedure from traditional Bayesian approaches. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the proposed Bayesian procedure outperforms existing methods in some performance metrics. Moreover, it achieves statistical efficiency comparable to the efficient estimator while accurately identifying cluster structures. These features highlight its ability to overcome challenges associated with traditional IV approaches for time-to-event data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.