ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Rapid Interactive Screening Test for Autism in Toddlers.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Rapid Interactive Screening Test for Autism in Toddlers (RITA-T) in a cohort of Chinese toddlers aged 18 to 36 months.
methodsScreening was conducted on toddlers aged 18 to 36 months, encompassing those with ASD, language impairments, developmental delays, and typical development. Evaluations were performed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed), the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2, and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers. A random sample of 25 toddlers underwent a follow-up assessment with the RITA-T two weeks later. Critical values were determined based on the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the RITA-T total score in differentiating ASD diagnoses.
resultsA total of 114 toddlers were enrolled in the study. The optimal cut-off score for the RITA-T in screening for ASD was determined to be 16, yielding a sensitivity of 0.918 and a specificity of 0.981, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.961 (95% CI: 0.924-0.998, p < 0.001). Additionally, the scale exhibited strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.828), high test-retest reliability (Spearman's rho coefficient = 0.962, p < 0.01), and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.975, 95% CI: 0.970-0.979, p < 0.001).
conclusionThe Chinese version of the RITA-T is a robust instrument for the early identification of ASD and is highly applicable for early screening efforts in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41569504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.