ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Developmental Trajectories of Developmental Disorders: Early Diagnosis for an Early Intervention.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEarly identification of children at risk for Intellectual Disability (ID) is complex, as formal diagnoses are often deferred until school age. However, early signs may emerge during the preschool years. This study aims to examine longitudinal changes in cognitive, adaptive and emotional-behavioral functioning from preschool to school age, to identify early markers predictive of later ID.
methodsEighty-eight children were assessed at two time points: preschool age (T0) and school age (T1). At T0, children were categorized into three diagnostic groups: Global Developmental Delay (GDD), Mixed Specific Developmental Disorder (MSDD), and Language Disorder (LD). At T1, the same children were re-evaluated and classified into: Intellectual Disability (ID), Language Disorder (LD), and Other Diagnoses (OD). Assessments included clinical observations, cognitive evaluations, and parent-reported questionnaires and interviews. Analyses were performed separately at T0, T1, and longitudinally.
resultsAt T0, all groups showed impaired adaptive functioning but differed in cognitive abilities, with the GDD group displaying more pronounced delays. At T1, only the ID group maintained significant deficits in both adaptive and cognitive domains. Regarding emotional-behavioral functioning, children with GDD exhibited more attention problems at T0. At T1, the ID group showed increased internalizing and externalizing symptoms, whereas LD and OD groups did not present significant psychopathological issues. A substantial rise in ID diagnoses was also observed at school age.
conclusionMonitoring developmental trajectories from an early age is essential to detect risk markers of ID. Early identification can support timely, targeted interventions for children and their families, improving long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41569503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.