Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569502›Full record

ArticleCell biochemistry and biophysics2026

Proteomic Profile of Skeletal Muscles and Liver in a Dexamethasone-Induced Atrophy Model: Insights into the Role of β-Hydroxy-β-Methylbutyrate on Contractile and Metabolic Protein.

Talita Mendes Oliveira Ventura, Cintia Kazuko Tokuhara, Mizael Pereira, Cleuber Rodrigo de Souza Bueno, Idvaldo Aparecido Favaretto-Junior, Iris Jasmin Santos German, Marcelie Priscila de Oliveira Rosso, Aline de Lima Leite, André Luís Shinohara, Rogério Leone Buchaim and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Talita Mendes Oliveira Ventura *Department of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Biochemistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cintia Kazuko Tokuhara *Department of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Biochemistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mizael PereiraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Biochemistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cleuber Rodrigo de Souza BuenoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidade do Sagrado Coração, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Idvaldo Aparecido Favaretto-JuniorDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Anatomy, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Iris Jasmin Santos GermanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Anatomy, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelie Priscila de Oliveira RossoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Anatomy, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aline de Lima LeiteDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Biochemistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
André Luís ShinoharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Anatomy, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rogério Leone BuchaimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Anatomy, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marília Afonso Rabelo BuzalafDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Biochemistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jesus Carlos AndreoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Anatomy, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo Cardoso de OliveiraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Discipline of Biochemistry, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo FOB-USP, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil. rodrigocardoso@usp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although some effects of glucocorticoids are necessary for metabolic responses during stress, chronic exposure to high levels of these hormones can cause side effects such as hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and muscle atrophy. Elevated glucocorticoid levels are observed in several clinical conditions, and their exogenous administration, such as high-dose dexamethasone treatments, is included in many clinical protocols. In this context, the supplement β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) emerges as a promising approach to counteract side effects its anticatabolic action. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the protein profile in the muscles and liver of rats treated with HMB in response to a model of severe muscle atrophy induced by dexamethasone. A total of 24 male Wistar rats, 60 days old, were used and distributed into the following groups: (1) Placebo Experimental Group (PEG), n = 8, treated only with saline solution; (2) Dexamethasone Experimental Group (DEG), n = 8, treated with intraperitoneal Dexamethasone injection (1 mg/kg/day); and (3) Dexamethasone + HMB Experimental Group (DEHG), n = 8, treated with intraperitoneal Dexamethasone injection (1 mg/kg/day) and gavaged with HMB (0.3 g/kg/day). After 10 days of treatment, the animals were euthanized for collection of the Soleus, Extensor Digitorum Longus (EDL) muscles, and liver, followed by protein processing and identification. In the Soleus muscle, when comparing DEG vs. PEG, proteins such as Myosin heavy chain 2, Myosin-4, Myosin-6, and Myosin-7 showed decreased expression in DEG compared to PEG. Comparing PEG vs. DEHG also showed a decrease in myosin expression in DEHG, but only Myosin-6 and Myosin-7 were reduced among the identified isoforms. In the EDL muscle, both DEG and DEHG showed reduced levels of all identified myosin subtypes. However, when comparing DEG and DEHG, the only myosin isoform preserved in DEHG compared to DEG was Myosin heavy chain 2. In the liver, dexamethasone treatment impaired glucose uptake, altered the Cytochrome P450 system, and reduced mitochondrial function, as reflected by reduced ATP levels. In conclusion, dexamethasone induced the loss of contractile proteins (myosins) in both muscles. The HMB dosage used in this study partially prevented myosin loss in the Soleus muscle but did not inhibit myosin loss in the EDL muscle. In the liver, dexamethasone induced changes in several proteins related to glucose metabolism; however, HMB was unable to attenuate dexamethasone-induced hepatic glycogenolysis.

Indexed as

DexamethasoneLiverMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyProteomicsValeratesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleRatsRats, Wistarbeta-hydroxyisovaleric acidDexamethasoneValeratesSkeletal muscle. Muscle atrophy. Liver. Dexamethasone. Leucine

Identifiers

PMID41569502
PMCPMC13234069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.