Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569493›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2026

A review of 3D printed medical implant design.

Jatinder Madan, Paul Witherell, David W Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jatinder MadanChandigarh College of Engineering and Technology (Degree Wing), Chandigarh, India. jatindermadan@ccet.ac.in.
Paul WitherellNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
David W RosenInstitute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Fusionopolis Way, #16-16 Connexis, Singapore, 138632, Republic of Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reviews the design of customized 3D printed (also referred to as additively manufactured) implants. A focus is placed on the information flow of design as it is processed, starting from a patient’s scan and culminating with the 3D printing compatible customized implant’s design. We discuss the challenges related to the introduction of 3D printing technologies into the design of the implant, the variabilities encountered, and opportunities for standardization. The paper identifies research and standardization gaps in four stages of a 3D printed customized implant’s design process, namely, medical imaging, constructing CAD (3D) model of VOI, design, and 3D printing compatible file formatting. We hope the paper will help drive research to overcome future challenges encountered in the design process of 3D printed customized medical implants.

Indexed as

3D printing (additive manufacturing)CustomizedDesign processImplantsVariabilities

Identifiers

PMID41569493
PMCPMC12829162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.