SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Rates of recurrence and symptom improvement following resection of spinal meningiomas in the pediatric population: individual participant data meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal meningiomas are rare in the pediatric population. While resection is the standard of care, limited data is available on long-term trajectories and clinical outcomes after surgery. Additionally, pediatric spinal meningiomas are frequently associated with distinct histopathology and higher recurrence risk compared to adults. We conducted a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and recurrence patterns in pediatric spinal meningiomas, emphasizing the influence of extent of resection.
methodsWe performed a systematic review of Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science according to PRISMA guidelines for studies reporting outcomes of spinal meningioma resection in pediatric patients. English-language, human-subject studies reporting postoperative outcomes after resection of pediatric spinal meningiomas were included. Mixed-age surgical series were eligible when pediatric patient-level outcomes were directly extractable (recurrence and/or postoperative neurologic outcome with follow-up), while single-patient case reports were excluded. Recurrence and symptom improvement were synthesized using random-effects models to account for between-study heterogeneity. Recurrence and symptom improvement rates following gross total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR) were compared with forest plots, Kaplan-Meier plots, and Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsNine case series published between 1990 and 2022 with 46 patients were included. Extent of resection was reported for 42 patients (GTR, n = 33 [79%]; STR, n = 9 [21%]). The pooled recurrence rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 28.5-63.4%). Recurrence was less common in patients who underwent GTR than STR (GTR, 15.7% [95% CI, 5.9-33.5%]; STR, 77.8% [95% CI, 40.2-96.1%]). Symptom improvement occurred more frequently in patients who underwent GTR than STR (GTR, 92.0% [95% CI, 72.5-98.6%]; STR, 33.3% [95% CI, 6.0-75.9%]). Cox proportional hazards models revealed a higher hazard of recurrence with STR versus GTR (hazard ratio, 11.6; p < 0.001).
conclusionIn pediatric patients, spinal meningiomas are associated with high-grade histology and high rates of recurrence. While the extent of postoperative neurologic symptom improvement varies, most patients experience a partial alleviation of symptoms. Patients in which GTR was achieved had significantly lower recurrence rates and significantly higher symptom improvement rates compared to STR. This study highlights the importance of achieving GTR when possible, to maximize progression-free survival and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41569438What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.