Trial reportPharmacological reports : PR2026
A preliminary proof-of-concept trial on the effects of ketamine on fatigue: a randomized crossover trial.
Trial report in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFatigue, a prevalent symptom of chronic illness, impacts quality of life. This proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial assessed the anti-fatigue effects of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) versus midazolam (0.045 mg/kg), the active comparator.
methodsTen participants, who were cancer survivors, with fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, or systemic lupus erythematosus, were randomized into Arm 1 (n = 4, Period 1: ketamine to Period 2: midazolam) or Arm 2 (n = 6, Period 1: midazolam to Period 2: ketamine).
resultsThe two periods were separately analyzed because of carryover effects with baseline fatigue scores, assessed by the fatigue visual analog scale (VAS), between the study periods (p = 0.03). Looking at changes in fatigue VAS scores from baseline (pre-infusion) to 3 days post-infusion, the ketamine group had a 21.0% decrease in Period 1 and 10.9% in Period 2, while the midazolam group showed a 17.7% decrease in Period 1 and 12.6% in Period 2. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in both periods. The largest fatigue score reduction for the ketamine group was at 1 day post-infusion, at - 38.7% in Period 1.
conclusionDespite no statistical significance, a reduction in real-time fatigue scores was observed, which exceeded the 20% efficacy threshold, the primary outcome, in the ketamine arm from pre-infusion to 3 days post-infusion. The carryover effects and the peak reduction in fatigue at 24 hours after ketamine administration suggest that future trials may need to consider a study design without cross-over and an optimal active placebo alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41569403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.