Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569379›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2026

What should AI explain to you? Visions of older adults regarding explainable AI.

Catharina Margaretha van Leersum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Catharina Margaretha van LeersumFaculty of Humanities, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Sectorplans Humane AISSH Council of the Netherlands
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesArtificial intelligence (AI) combined with smart sensors or conversational agents are becoming part of our lives, and have the potential to improve aging in place by supporting independent living. Trust and willingness to use AI seem essential for actual embedding. Explainable AI (XAI), originating from the recognition that AI infrastructures often operate in an opaque, "black boxed" way, might assist in understanding the underlying logic of AI-made decisions. However, it is unknown what older adults think about XAI and what they consider as needed explainability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsI conducted 28 semi-structured interviews to explore XAI in the worlds of older adults. Inductive analysis was applied to analyze what do older adults know about AI and how do they imagine our society with AI? What is XAI to them and how do they value explainability?

findingsThe analysis resulted in nine themes: four regarding the knowledge on AI of older adults, including definitions, knowledge acquisition, attitudes, and expectations, and five themes were leading for the views on XAI in which XAI is not desirable, XAI is necessary, or collaboration is preferred. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The visions of XAI are different from current technological discourses. For older adults, XAI is not only technological, but a constellation between humans and machines. Most argue that a form of joint decision-making is important. As a follow-up, it seems recommended to explore the enactment of XAI in real life, and investigate the form or degree of XAI needed and for whom.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAging in PlaceDecision MakingFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchAge in placeBlack boxDecision-makingGerontechnology

Identifiers

PMID41569379
PMCPMC13135710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.