ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026
Pericardiectomy for Constrictive and Recurrent Pericarditis: State of the Art Update.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative and Mid-Term Outcomes of Primary Versus Redo Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes of constrictive pericarditis and exploratory associations with inflammatory features: a 17-year single-center experience.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review provides a contemporary surgical view on constrictive and recurrent pericarditis. RECENT
findingsCardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and heart catheterization are complementary tools for diagnosis and management of patients considered for pericardiectomy. Radical pericardiectomy, unlike total/complete, represents the most extensive resection. Radical or total/complete pericardiectomy via median sternotomy is preferred over partial for both recurrent and constrictive pericarditis, to minimize the risk of symptoms and/or constriction recurrence. Utilization of cardiopulmonary bypass may facilitate the completeness and safety of the procedure. In surgical planning, attention should be paid to intraoperative challenges, especially low cardiac output syndrome, tricuspid regurgitation, and coronary injury. A multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers is essential to optimize outcomes. Radical or complete pericardiectomy is advised over partial to avoid the symptoms or constriction recurrence owing to the remaining pericardium. Further research is mandatory to identify the optimal timing and precise extent of pericardiectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.