ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
A validated CT-based scoring system for lateral compression type one pelvic ring injuries provides insight into the spectrum of injury severity and guides treatment decisions; a prospective study.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo gain insight into the spectrum of injury severity in lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries using a validated CT-based scoring system and to determine how injury severity relates to treatment and clinical outcomes.
methodsA prospective study was performed in 203 patients presenting with LC1 injuries at a level one trauma center. CT-scans were assessed using a CT-based scoring system that quantifies injury severity on a scale of 5–14. Patients were categorized into three injury severity groups: low (scores 5–6), intermediate (scores 7–9), and high (scores 10–14) subgroups based on level of sacral displacement, Denis classification, sacral column involvement, inferior ramus displacement, and superior ramus fracture location. Clinical outcomes included delayed intervention due to mal- of non-union, Dutch Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and EuroQol-5D 5L at one-year follow-up. Normative data was used to determine recovery.
resultsAll patients with low scores (n = 36), 94% of intermediate scores (n = 99), and 71% of high scores (n = 44) were treated conservatively. No conservatively treated patients required delayed intervention. In all subgroups, most recovered to the level of the normative data, with no significant differences in outcomes between operatively and conservatively treated patients.
conclusionsThe LC1 CT-based scoring system provides insight into the spectrum of injury severity and helps guide treatment decisions for LC1 injuries. Patients with low and intermediate injury severity, determined by degree of sacral and pubic rami involvement, can be treated nonoperatively. Those with high injury severity can be treated either conservatively or operatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.