ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2026
STING predicts patterns of failure in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The TMEM173/STING protein is linked to therapeutic resistance in preclinical models of HNSCC (Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma). To evaluate STING as a biomarker, quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) was performed on a tissue microarray (TMA) cohort of primary HNSCC (n = 72). Cytokeratin and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining were used to differentiate between tumor or stromal compartments, and patient groups were dichotomized based on STING QIF scores. HNSCCs display variable STING protein levels in both tumor cell and stromal compartments. STING QIF score in tumor cells is associated with p16 positivity, with similar nonsignificant trends observed for stromal QIF values. In cohort 1, elevated STING levels in either tumor cells (P = .029) or stroma (P = .023) significantly improved DFS. These findings were validated in a second oropharyngeal HNSCC TMA cohort (n = 92) where borderline or significant differences in DFS were observed for elevated STING in tumor cells (P = .066) or the stroma (P = .028). A more detailed breakdown of failure patterns in cohort 2 revealed that elevated STING in tumor (P = .015) or stroma (P = .054) predicts local-regional control, and a trend for reduced distant failure was also observed for elevated stromal STING (P = .067). Local-regional recurrence was rare in HPV+ tumors and occurred only with low STING expression. In multivariate analysis, p16 was a significant predictor for local control, whereas elevated STING was of borderline significance (P = .051). These results suggest that STING protein levels in the tumor cell are a biomarker for predicting HNSCC local control after radiation therapy, and elevated STING in tumor stroma may be associated with a reduced risk of distant failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.