Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41569039›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Cue combination for depth perception in macular degeneration: Motion parallax augments disparity.

Jade Guénot, Preeti Verghese

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jade GuénotSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Preeti VergheseSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Maximizing Visual Potential in Age-Related Macular DegenerationR01EY027390 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Preeti Verghese · 2017 to 2026
$5.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In macular degeneration (MD), depth perception from binocular disparity is impacted in regions with vision loss in either eye, but monocular cues like motion parallax remain available. This study investigates whether combining motion parallax with disparity improves depth perception and compensates for the loss of depth due to central field loss (CFL). Eleven MD participants and 19 controls viewed a horizontal sine-wave corrugation in depth, defined by disparity and/or motion parallax, judging which half-cycle appeared farther away in depth. We measured thresholds for each cue alone and for the two cues combined. In MD participants, cue integration benefits depended on scotoma characteristics. Disparity performance correlated strongly with the size of the stereoblind zone, while motion parallax thresholds showed no significant relation, suggesting preservation despite CFL. MD participants with extensive stereoblind zones showed elevated thresholds for both single cues compared to controls but demonstrated optimal integration when disparity was added to motion parallax. Those with small stereoblind zones achieved control-like thresholds and exhibited optimal or better than predicted integration. However, asymmetric patterns emerged with suboptimal performance when motion parallax was added to threshold disparity. Controls with simulated scotomas maintained stable integration, contrasting with variable patterns in MD. Our results show that individuals with CFL retain significant capacity for depth cue integration, contingent upon residual binocular disparity. Thus, motion parallax emerges as a valuable compensatory cue to improve depth perception in individuals with MD.

Indexed as

CuesDepth PerceptionMacular DegenerationMotion PerceptionVision DisparityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationScotomaSensory ThresholdsVision, BinocularVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID41569039
PMCPMC12849822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.