ArticleJournal of vision2026
Cue combination for depth perception in macular degeneration: Motion parallax augments disparity.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring eye-hand coordination in central field loss with virtual reality.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In macular degeneration (MD), depth perception from binocular disparity is impacted in regions with vision loss in either eye, but monocular cues like motion parallax remain available. This study investigates whether combining motion parallax with disparity improves depth perception and compensates for the loss of depth due to central field loss (CFL). Eleven MD participants and 19 controls viewed a horizontal sine-wave corrugation in depth, defined by disparity and/or motion parallax, judging which half-cycle appeared farther away in depth. We measured thresholds for each cue alone and for the two cues combined. In MD participants, cue integration benefits depended on scotoma characteristics. Disparity performance correlated strongly with the size of the stereoblind zone, while motion parallax thresholds showed no significant relation, suggesting preservation despite CFL. MD participants with extensive stereoblind zones showed elevated thresholds for both single cues compared to controls but demonstrated optimal integration when disparity was added to motion parallax. Those with small stereoblind zones achieved control-like thresholds and exhibited optimal or better than predicted integration. However, asymmetric patterns emerged with suboptimal performance when motion parallax was added to threshold disparity. Controls with simulated scotomas maintained stable integration, contrasting with variable patterns in MD. Our results show that individuals with CFL retain significant capacity for depth cue integration, contingent upon residual binocular disparity. Thus, motion parallax emerges as a valuable compensatory cue to improve depth perception in individuals with MD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.