Observational studyAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
Remote Assessment of Ataxia Severity in SCA3 Across Multiple Centers and Time Points.
Observational study in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Remote Online-Based Application of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSpinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is a genetically defined ataxia. The Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is a clinician-reported outcome that measures ataxia severity at a single time point. In its standard application, SARA fails to capture short-term fluctuations, limiting its sensitivity in trials. To overcome this, we employed SARA
methodsWe assessed feasibility and validity of SARA
resultsAdherence to the study protocol was generally high (80.2%) with valid scores in 79.2% of 1459 recordings. Maximum adherence occurred over a 4-day period (84.8%). Fluctuations ranged 3.0 points between lowest and highest scores (IQR: 2.5-4.5) and 1.0 point based on score IQRs (IQR: 0.5-1.5), corresponding to 10.7% and 3.6% of the maximal SARA
interpretationSARA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.