ArticleCancer medicine2026
Clinical Considerations of Splenic Dose Constraints to Mitigate Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Considerations of Splenic Dose Constraints to Mitigate Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe spleen dose-volume threshold for lymphopenia in abdominal radiotherapy has not yet reached a consensus. Our previous research indicated a correlation between these factors, but the threshold has not been determined. Therefore, we investigated the dynamic changes in lymphocytes during radiotherapy (RT), identified the spleen dose threshold, and examined how these factors affect patient prognosis.
methodsThe absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) of gastric cancer patients were collected before, during, and after RT. Lymphocyte recovery status was assessed using the lymphocyte recovery index (LRI). LRI cut off was considered as insufficient recovery. Splenic dosimetric parameters were collected, and their impact on predicting grade 4 (G4) lymphopenia was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between lymphocyte depletion and recovery status and prognosis.
results159 patients were enrolled. The median ALC dropped by 85.71% after RT. The occurrence of G4 and G1-3 lymphopenia was observed in 30.2% and 69.8% of cases, respectively. There were 12.6% of patients whose ALC had recovered at 120 days after RT, while the remaining 87.4% were still accompanied by lymphopenia. Cox multivariable analysis showed that pTNM stage and LRI were independent prognostic factors affecting overall survival, and the independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival were pTNM stage and change in ALC. Splenic D
conclusionsPatients with severe lymphocyte decline during RT and insufficient lymphocyte recovery afterward have a worse prognosis. It is important not only to prevent severe lymphopenia during RT but also to focus on improving lymphocyte recovery after RT. Constraining the spleen V
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.