Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41568395›Full record

ArticlePattern recognition letters2026

Plug and Play Labeling Strategies for Boosting Small Brain Lesion Segmentation.

Liang Shang, Zhengyang Lou, William Sethares, Andrew Alexander, Vivek Prabhakaran, Veena Nair, Nagesh Adluru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pattern recognition letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liang ShangUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Zhengyang LouUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
William SetharesUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Andrew AlexanderUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Vivek PrabhakaranUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Veena NairUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Nagesh AdluruUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

Waisman Center Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD105353 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Brittany Gail Travers · 2021 to 2026
$8.5M
Stroke Connectome MRI Biomarkers for VCID Risk AssessmentR01NS123378 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nagesh Adluru, Veena A Nair · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
The Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy Connectome ProjectR01NS111022 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI STRUCK, AARON F · 2020 to 2024
$3.1M
PET/MR Correlates of Accelerated Aging in Chronic EpilepsyR01NS117568 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Alan Blair McMillan, Vivek Prabhakaran · 2021 to 2026
$3.0M
Stroke Rehabilitation utilizing BCI technologyR01NS105646 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PRABHAKARAN, VIVEK · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON ADULT NEUROGENESISF32NS011102 · NINDS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI COLAMARINO, SOPHIA A · 2000 to 2001
$83k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105353NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS011102NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105646NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111022NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117568NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of small brain lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for understanding neurological disorders and guiding clinical decisions. However, detecting small lesions remains challenging due to low contrast and limited size. This study proposes two simple yet effective labeling strategies, Multi-Size Labeling (MSL) and Distance-Based Labeling (DBL), that can seamlessly integrate into existing segmentation networks. MSL groups lesions based on volume to enable size-aware learning, while DBL emphasizes lesion boundaries to enhance structural sensitivity. We evaluate our approach on two benchmark datasets: stroke lesion segmentation using the Anatomical Tracings of Lesions After Stroke (ATLAS) v2.0 dataset and multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using the MSLesSeg dataset. On ATLAS v2.0, our approach achieved higher Dice (+1.3%), F1 (+2.4%), precision (+7.2%), and recall (+3.6%) scores compared to the top-performing method from a previous challenge. On MSLesSeg, our approach achieved the highest Dice score (0.7146) and ranked first among 16 international teams. Additionally, we examined the effectiveness of attention-based and mamba-based segmentation models but found that our proposed labeling strategies yielded more consistent improvements. These findings demonstrate that MSL and DBL offer a robust and generalizable solution for enhancing small brain lesion segmentation across various tasks and architectures. Our code is available at: https://github.com/nadluru/StrokeLesSeg.

Indexed as

Data AugmentationDeep LearningLabelingMultiple SclerosisSegmentationSmall LesionStroke

Identifiers

PMID41568395
PMCPMC12818933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.