ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2026
Sealing ability of Biodentine, zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate as furcation perforation repair materials: an
Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Sealing Ability of Different Materials for Repair of Iatrogenic Perforations: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of Biodentine, zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement (GIC), and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) as furcation repair materials. Materials and methods: A total of 50 extracted permanent maxillary molars were collected and divided into three experimental groups and one control group. Group I - Biodentine ( Statistical analysis: The results were analysed statistically by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. Result: No statistically significant difference in sealing ability was observed between Biodentine, zirconia reinforced GIC, and MTA when used as a furcation perforation repair material. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Biodentine, zirconia reinforced GIC, and MTA showed sealing ability comparable to each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.