ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Ocular toxicities of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in hematologic malignancies.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Ocular Manifestations Associated with Hematologic Malignancies: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ocular Toxicities of Anticancer Therapies in the Era of Precision Oncology: A Practical, Clinically Oriented Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted therapies and immune-based treatments have transformed the management of hematologic malignancies. However, these agents can also result in unintended ocular adverse effects. These toxicities are often underrecognized but may significantly affect patient quality of life and therapeutic decision-making. A comprehensive understanding of these effects is essential for interdisciplinary management. This review synthesizes the current evidence regarding ocular toxicities associated with modern targeted and immune therapies used in hematologic cancers. Data were drawn from case reports, clinical trials, observational studies, and pharmacovigilance databases. Ocular side effects were reported across all major therapy classes, including cell therapies, kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and proteasome inhibitors. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies commonly induce neuro-ophthalmic symptoms such as photophobia and visual disturbances, frequently in association with neurotoxicity syndromes. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors were associated with a range of effects, including periorbital edema, uveitis, and retinal vascular complications. Immune checkpoint inhibitors caused inflammatory eye diseases such as uveitis, optic neuritis, and ocular myasthenia, consistent with immune-related adverse events. Certain antibody-drug conjugates, particularly those used in multiple myeloma, produced high rates of ocular surface disease that required dose modifications. While many adverse effects were reversible, some caused vision-threatening complications that required prompt ophthalmologic intervention. Pediatric-specific data were sparse, and long-term ocular outcomes remain poorly defined. Ocular toxicities from modern hematologic cancer therapies span a broad clinical spectrum and vary by drug class. Increased awareness of these complications among oncologists and ophthalmologists can support earlier detection and treatment. Accurate clinical descriptions of ocular adverse events and effective management recommendations in these settings will help improve patient outcomes and their quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.