Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41568328›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Resilience and evolutionary insights in PPI networks: comparative analysis of node resilience and centrality measures.

Jiarui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jiarui ZhangSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Information Engineering, Yichun University, Yichun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks serve as the central framework for deciphering the modular structure of cellular functions and signal transduction mechanisms. While established network topological Measures (such as degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality) can statically characterize nodal connectivity density or pathway intermediation capacity, they fail to dynamically capture cascade following node failure. Method: This study employs systems biology approaches to quantitatively analyze network resilience based on bacterial PPI network data obtained from the Stanford Network Analysis Platform (SNAP). First, a progressive node removal strategy was implemented to simulate cascading failure propagation and evaluate system-level resilience degradation dynamics. Subsequently, single-node knockout experiments were systematically conducted to quantify local topological disruption effects, with network fragmentation metrics (e.g., giant component size decay rate) being integrated to establish the Node Resilience (NR) index. To validate the biological relevance of NR, we developed a multidimensional analytical framework that performs cross-correlation analysis between NR and classical centrality measures [Degree centrality (DC), Betweenness centrality (BC), Closeness centrality (CC), Eigenvector centrality (EC)], enabling systematic revelation of consensus vital nodes identified by both approaches, and unique sensitive nodes detectable only through resilience-oriented perturbation analysis. Results and Discussion: Our systematic node removal simulations revealed biphasic resilience degradation across bacterial PPI networks: progressive node failure induced gradual resilience decay whereas exceeding a critical threshold for each network triggered accelerated collapse. This phase transition aligns with evolutionary design principles - modular architectures buffer localized perturbations through functional redundancy, but inter-modular bridge depletion beyond criticality propagates cascading failures via weakly coupled connections. Notably, NR exhibited a strong negative correlation with BC, contrasting with weak associations for DC, CC, and EC. This dichotomy arises because BC quantifies cross-modular information brokerage - high-BC nodes act as structural keystones whose removal disconnects functional modules, drastically reducing global entropy. Conversely, for DC, CC, and EC primarily reflect local connectivity patterns with limited cascade propagation potential.

Indexed as

biological networkscentrality measuresnetwork resiliencenetwork structurenode resilience

Identifiers

PMID41568328
PMCPMC12818785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.