ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Patients' perceptions of autonomy in palliative care: Two patient interview exemplars.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although palliative care embraces person-centred principles and autonomy to meet patients' holistic needs, autonomy is not automatically assured and few studies cover patients' lived experiences. Consequently, current thinking about dying and palliative care practices would benefit from an in-depth understanding of patient experiences. Such research provides an opportunity to challenge assumptions about patient preferences for the amount and type of care and decision-making involvement, especially for the way patient preferences may vary between individuals and change through the palliative care process. Objectives: This project aimed to investigate patient conceptualisations and preferences for autonomy while receiving palliative care. Design: This qualitative phenomenological study explored patients' experiences of autonomy in home-based palliative care in Queensland, Australia. Methods: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded with two participants to learn their perspectives regarding autonomy in palliative care. Transcripts were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results: Four themes were identified: (a) my involvement in healthcare decisions, (b) change to my autonomy during illness progression, (c) self-assessing my abilities to exercise autonomy and (d) my coping mechanisms for loss of autonomy. Palliative care patients perceived and managed their autonomy amidst their illnesses, revealing a sense of loss of autonomy extending beyond healthcare into many daily activities. Participants wished to exercise autonomy in nuanced ways, varying in intensity across many aspects of their lives, underscoring the importance of recognising and respecting individuals' wishes for autonomy. Conclusion: Partnering with individuals receiving palliative care provided authentic insight into their level and experience of autonomy. While many health practitioners aim to facilitate autonomy in patients receiving palliative care, flexibility is required to recognise variable patient needs. Such approaches will further ensure autonomy moves beyond a singular view of healthcare decision participation, to encompass changes to preferences during palliative care, while recognising how patients exercise autonomy via self-assessment and coping mechanisms. Trial registration: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.