ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
A comprehensive outside-of-school intervention to promote school attendance and achievement during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What Works to Keep Students in School? A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Reduce School Absenteeism.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: School absenteeism predicts poor academic achievement and long-term health inequities. Chronic absenteeism increased dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic, and both student attendance and achievement disparities widened. This study examined the association between participation in an intensive outside-of-school intervention, Student U, and school absenteeism, as well as changes in attendee academic performance during the pandemic. Study design: Observational cohort study. Methods: A simple linear regression model was performed testing the association between Student U attendance and schools absences. Paired t-tests and a global test for overall improvement using generalized estimating equations were performed to examine changes in pre- and post-test academic performance. Results: The sample included 65 students (Hispanic/Latino, 56.9 %; Non-Hispanic Black/African American, 33.8 %; 80.0 % first-generation college-bound). For every day a 7th-grade student attended Student U, school absences decreased by 0.14 days (p = 0.02). Mean differences in overall improvement for 7th- and 10th-grade student test scores were 23.65 (95 % CI: 19.91, 27.39; p < 0.001) and 22.12 (95 % CI: 15.67, 28.58; p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: We demonstrated the association between participation in Student U and lower school absenteeism, as well as improved academic performance across multiple subjects for underserved youth. Findings reinforce the potential for comprehensive and intensive outside-of-school programs to support underserved youth and mitigate inequities following pandemics and other public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.