ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
A frugal arduino-based spirometer for low-resource settings: design, development and validation of a preliminary prototype.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medical devices are essential for maintaining resilient health systems worldwide. However, their distribution does not reflect this, with as many as 76% of devices being used by 13% of the world's population. Most devices, being designed for High-Income countries (HICs) and failing to consider the local needs of other settings, often fail when deployed in other contexts. Spirometers particularly are underutilised in these regions despite high respiratory disease burden. This study aims to develop and validate a frugal affordable spirometer for low-resource settings (LRSs). Methods: A Venturi-style spirometer was designed using 3D printed components, low-cost electronics such as the Arduino nano (ESP32) and differential pressure sensor (MXP5010DP), and software such as MATLAB and Arduino IDE. The device was validated through a 2-L pump test and a prospective evaluation study involving 30 participants, comparing its performance to a CE marked spirometer. Key metrics included were the mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Pearsons's correlation, and Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: The device was successfully 3D printed from Polylactic acid (PLA) using an Ultimaker 2+ printer and assembled with electronic components. The device achieved a MAP error of 1.53% in the pump test. In the prospective evaluation study, the device showed strong agreement for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) with the benchmark device (ICC = 0.97, r = 0.97, p < 0.001). Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements were less accurate (MAPE = 18.01%) but still demonstrated strong correlation (ICC = 0.80, r = 0.89). This accuracy was in line with the International Standards Organisation 26782:2009 standards for accurately measuring volume. Conclusion: This study designed, prototyped and validated a spirometer that can be used as a lung screening tool, that achieves high accuracies comparable to those of other portable spirometers. This study also validated that frugal engineering could reduce the cost of devices without affecting the clinical accuracy. Whilst promising, further validation with clinical populations and better alignment with regulatory standards are needed before use in LRSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.