Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41568157›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

AI-Carbon-Energy: Spillover effects and drivers in interconnected markets.

Mingming Zhang, Yue Pan, Bin Su, Dequn Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingming ZhangCollege of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China.
Yue PanCollege of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China.
Bin SuEnergy Studies Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119620, Singapore.
Dequn ZhouCollege of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the spillover effects between the AI market, international carbon market, and energy markets based on a time-varying parameter vector autoregression model. Further, the study uses a multivariate quantile-to-quantile regression model to identify the macro and micro factors influencing spillover effects. The results show that there are significant spillover effects among the three markets. The AI and new energy markets are the main risk-transmitting markets with respect to the return and volatility spillovers. For skewness and kurtosis, all traditional energy markets except the gas market become risk transmitters. Across all moments, the carbon market consistently is a net recipient of risk. The spillover effects clearly vary with time. Short-term dynamics drive returns and skewness connections, and long-term effects primarily drive volatility and kurtosis connections. In addition, geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, climate risk, AI technological progress, and investor attention may exert differentiated impacts on various spillover effects.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence applicationsComputer modelingEnergy management

Identifiers

PMID41568157
PMCPMC12818280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.